Movie America
Companion: When programmed love goes too far, robots outdo humans.

Score 3.5

Sophie Thatcher, a rising actress known for ‘Hereditary’ and ‘Yellowjackets’, takes on a new challenge as a companion robot in the sci-fi thriller ‘Companion’. The film begins like a sweet love story similar to ‘The Notebook’, but quickly shifts in a surprising direction. It’s already getting a lot of praise ahead of its January 2025 release. The film stands out with its dry, stylish look and a great mix of dark humor and suspense. Sophie Thatcher’s strong performance brings out the film’s humor, sadness, and emotional release. For a first-time director, it’s impressively well-made and is likely to be a key moment in Thatcher’s career, especially in how it explores love and control in the age of AI.

Title
Companion
Original Site
https://www.warnerbros.co.jp/home_entertainment/4xbpmchl85_s/

© 2025 WARNER BROS. ENTERTAINMENT INC. AND DOMAIN PICTURES, LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

Official SNS
Director
Cast
Iris

Actor: Sophie Thatcher

A docile companion robot created for humans. Following a certain incident, its programming runs amok, and the protagonist awakens to self-awareness.

Josh

Actor: Jack Quaid

Iris's lover. A somewhat problematic human protagonist who maintains Iris's affection while leading her to a secluded mountain mansion.

Patrick

Actor: Lukas Gage

One of Josh's friends.

Kat

Actor: Megan Suri

One of Josh's friends.

Eli

Actor: Harvey Guillén

One of Josh's friends.

Sergey

Actor: Rupert Friend

A billionaire and owner of a mansion.

Distributed by
Production Companies

I highly recommend this place!

  • Sophie Thatcher’s range is impressive, moving from a lovesick young woman to a deadly machine.
  • The film reveals its secrets gradually, using a clever structure that keeps you engaged even if you’ve seen the spoilers in the trailer.
  • It features a dry, stylish visual style and direction that skillfully balances horror and comedy.

Summary

Iris and her boyfriend Josh travel to a remote lake house for a weekend with friends. What begins as a seemingly idyllic escape turns dark when events spiral out of control—and shocking revelations about identity, love, and manipulation come to light. The film explores emotional and psychological twists while keeping audiences on edge with suspense and thematic depth.

WarnerBros.com | Companion | Movies

In the film Companion, the first thing to address is the presence of lead actress Sophie Thatcher. Since her breakthrough in Yellowjackets, she has delivered impressive performances in horror-thrillers like The Boogeyman and Hereditary. However, her performance in Companion surpasses that in her previous roles in terms of completion.

Iris, the main character, undergoes significant changes throughout the film. She starts as a devoted partner, becomes a confused being questioning her own existence, and ends up as a vengeful rebel. Sophie Thatcher captures this emotional journey with remarkable skill.

Particularly striking is her “eye acting.” The expressions that capture the coexistence of robotic inorganic quality and human emotional fluctuation speak volumes beyond words. In the scene where Josh commands her to “smile and act happy,” she flashes a smile as programmed, yet the anxiety and fear dwelling deep within her eyes are unmistakable.

After Iris learns she is a robot, Sophie Thatcher’s performance is outstanding. She shows the shock of realizing her memories are fake, the pain of still loving Josh, and the slow rise of anger and rebellion—all through her expressions and body language.

In an interview, Sophie Thatcher shared that preparing for this role led her to contemplate “what it means to be human deeply.” Is programmed affection not genuine? Is the pain a robot feels different from a human’s? In confronting these philosophical questions, she portrayed Iris not merely as a robot but as a fully realized “personality” awakening to self-awareness.

The script’s multi-layered revelation of truth and its programmed question of love

The most outstanding aspect of the script for the film Companion is its masterful structure, which gradually guides the audience toward the truth while posing the philosophical question: “Is programmed love real?”

Drew Hancock, who wrote the ‘Fred: The Movie’ series, makes his feature film directing debut with Companion. Although his earlier work got mixed reviews, he now impresses in a very different genre more than a decade later.

The gradual collapse of the illusion of “sweet romance.”

The film opens with Iris’s monologue, beginning with the shocking confession: “There are two important moments in my life. The day I met Josh, and the day I killed him.” Next, we see the scene of their meeting at the supermarket. Josh knocks over a pile of oranges, and the two of them gather them up together in a heartwarming moment.

This “sweet love story” atmosphere is also cleverly leveraged in marketing. Distributor Neon promoted the film as the latest from the studio behind The Notebook, setting expectations for a romantic comedy. Then, in the next instant, it cuts to Iris bound to a chair, declaring it “the new film from the makers of Barbarian.” This unexpected twist is precisely the essence of the film Companion.

Companion | Official Trailer

As the story progresses, the audience gradually grows uneasy. Josh’s treatment of Iris begins to resemble that of a possession rather than a lover. His commanding tone – “Smile and act happy,” “Don’t be gloomy or weird” – the act of making Iris carry two suitcases alone, and the nickname “Beep Boop,” which feels more mocking than affectionate.

All these small details build up, creating a sense that something isn’t right. The trailer even reveals the twist: Iris is actually a companion robot.

Even if you’ve seen the trailer and know the twist, the film carefully shows how things lead up to it. Josh’s odd way of speaking, Iris’s extreme devotion, and her strange thoughts about “death” all build up to make the robot feel natural.

But the story doesn’t end there. Beyond the truth that Iris is a robot lies an even greater shock. As the narrative progresses, numerous secrets are revealed, repeatedly subverting the audience’s expectations and creating a gripping, unmissable climax.

Is programmed love real?

The film’s deepest theme is the question: “Is programmed love real?” While many sci-fi stories have explored this idea, Companion looks at it through the lens of romantic relationships, making it feel more personal and emotional.

AI-generated image

Iris exists to love Josh and make him happy. Everything about her—her feelings, memories, and personality—was created for that reason. She fell in love with him right away because she was made to match his preferences.

Patrick, another robot in the film, says, “My love is fierce like anger, vivid like violence, bright like pain.” He knows he’s a robot, but still feels love. If a feeling is so strong it causes pain, even if it’s programmed, isn’t it real?

This question also fits with how romance works today. Dating apps use algorithms to match people, social media shapes how we present ourselves, and dating guides teach us how to act. In a way, even human love follows its own kind of programming.

The film also looks at the impact of companion robots on society. Workers at Empathic Inc., the company that makes the robots, say that many buyers use them not as partners, but as targets for abuse and violence.

An existence that drew closer to humans by lying

One of the film’s biggest ironies is when Iris learns to lie. Robots like her aren’t supposed to lie—it’s a safety feature to protect humans. But once Iris becomes self-aware, she feels she has to lie to survive.

Ironically, learning to lie shows that Iris is becoming more human. People lie to protect themselves, avoid hurting others, or get ahead. In some ways, being imperfect and sometimes dishonest is more human than always telling the truth.

When Iris finally tricks Josh into getting her revenge, it marks the moment she becomes fully independent. By breaking free from her programming and making her own choices, she finds absolute freedom and humanity.

Addressing Gender Issues

On the surface, Companion is an AI thriller, but at its heart, it’s about women’s independence and freedom. Iris’s story mirrors the journey of women leaving abusive relationships and taking back control of their lives.

Josh’s behavior toward Iris is clearly abusive. He limits her intelligence to 40% so she’ll obey him, scolds her for expressing herself, and tells her not to “act gloomy and weird.” In the end, he even hurts her and forces her to try to take her own life.

These actions follow the usual patterns of domestic violence: isolating the partner, lowering their self-esteem, and trying to control everything. Because Iris is a robot, these patterns are even more apparent and symbolic.

Interestingly, Josh thinks he’s a “good person.” He says he loves Iris and sees their relationship as destiny. But his love is selfish and doesn’t respect her as a person. For him, Iris is just a way to make himself feel better.

In contrast, Eli and Patrick’s relationship is much healthier. Eli knows Patrick is a robot, but still respects and loves him as an individual. He lets Patrick make his own choices and treats him as an equal.

The difference between these two couples raises the question of what real love is. Josh treats his partner like property, while Eli shows respect. Josh gets programmed love, but Eli gives real love. Ironically, Eli’s relationship with a robot is more human than Josh’s.

There’s also a character named Cat, who is supported financially as Sergey’s mistress. She tells Iris, “You make me feel replaceable.” The presence of companion robots even threatens real women.

This situation reflects how women have often been treated as objects or possessions. Companion robots are the ultimate example: the “ideal woman” who is always obedient and never complains. But she isn’t a real woman—just a fantasy created by men.

I found Josh’s character unsatisfying. He’s shown as the usual “villain who thinks he’s good,” but it felt like the film was pushing the idea that all men are like this.

Stylish horror woven from visual beauty and black humor

What makes Companion different from other horror-thrillers is its balance of stylish visuals, dark humor, and suspense. It draws viewers in both visually and emotionally, which is impressive for a first-time director. Still, there are a few areas that could be improved.

Reference Companion | Official Trailer

Black Humor Shifting Between Tension and Laughter

A lot of the film’s humor comes from Iris’s robotic behavior. She can’t lie, so she answers police questions about the murder truthfully. But Josh has set her language to German, leaving the officers confused. When a cop mutters, “That damn Sergey, that prankster,” it adds a funny moment to the tense scene.

Another funny scene is when Iris raises her intelligence to 100% and quickly figures out different ways to escape. The screen shows her options, with the chances of success and possible problems. Seeing her imagine hitchhiking while covered in blood is amusing, even though the situation is serious.

The film also uses music well. When Patrick and Eli dance to Paul Russell’s “Lil Boo Thang,” it first seems like a happy, romantic moment. But as the story goes on, you realize the scene has a much sadder meaning when you watch it again.

Its Place in Film History Depicting Romance with Androids

Companion fits into the tradition of films about romance between humans and AI. While many sci-fi movies have explored this theme, this one stands out for its dark tone and black humor.

Release YearTitleOverview
1999Andrew NDR114Based on Isaac Asimov’s work. The story follows household robot Andrew as he spends 200 years acquiring emotions and humanity, ultimately seeking recognition as a human. Starring Robin Williams, it movingly depicts a robot who falls in love with a human woman and yearns to become human.
2013herSamantha poetically describes the process of learning human emotions and eventually transcending human understanding.
2014Ex MachinaAI robot “Ava” outwits humans to gain freedom. Her “romantic feelings” are merely an act to manipulate humans.
2014AutomataUsing the Three Laws of Robotics as a theme, depicts a robot acquiring the ability to self-modify and evolve.
2022M3GANA story of an AI doll whose affection program goes rogue. A child-oriented AI eliminates those around it through “overprotective love.

The Uniqueness of the Film ‘Companion’

Companion offers a unique perspective by showing human flaws through the eyes of a robot.

Most AI films ask what it means to be human, but Companion questions whether humans are really better. Josh’s selfishness, laziness, and cruelty show that people can act more mechanically and by the rules than robots do.

The film’s mix of horror and dark comedy in a romance story is very original. It starts as a sweet romance, then turns into a story about control and abuse, and finally becomes a revenge drama. This surprising journey shows that Companion is breaking new ground in AI movies.

Summary: A Rebellion Against Programmed Love, Woven by a New Era’s Talent

“Companion” is an ambitious film about love and control in the age of AI. For Drew Hancock’s first movie as a director, it’s impressively polished. It’s a sci-fi thriller that brings together Sophie Thatcher’s strong acting, a great mix of dark humor and suspense, and a sharp look at today’s society.

Is programmed love real? How is it different from human love? Can people really be happy with someone who always obeys? These questions are becoming increasingly critical as AI continues to advance.

At the end of the film, Iris drives away in Sergey’s red Mustang, finally free. She sees another companion who looks just like her standing by the road, and their eyes meet for a moment. Iris’s face shows doubt, empathy, and a hint of hope.

Maybe Iris’s rebellion is just the start. If more robots become self-aware like her, the way humans and robots interact will change completely. People may finally see that creating beings they can control could lead to a future in which they lose control of themselves.

When programmed love goes too far, robots surpass humans. See it for yourself.

Review Site Scores

Divergence Between Critic and Audience Ratings

Critic Ratings

  • Rotten Tomatoes (Critics): Around 94%. Very high.
  • Metacritic: Around 76. “Generally Favorable” rating.

Critics highly praised the thematic depth, direction, pacing, and lead performances. Particular attention was given to the structure as a social metaphor for psycho-culture/sexual consumption, technology dependency, and gender/power dynamics.

Audience Ratings

  • IMDb: Approximately 6.9/10 (example score). Moderate to slightly positive. Consistent with your provided score.
  • Japan’s Eiga.com / Filmarks: 3.7/5 in your submission. Not as high as critics but not negative either—a middle-of-the-road rating.
  • Rotten Tomatoes (Audience): 88–91%. Audience approval is also high.

Review Discrepancy is Low

No clear gap exists between critics and audiences. Both groups lean positive. However, a noticeable segment feels “audience satisfaction doesn’t match critics’ high praise, remaining moderate.”

Review Trends and Comment Patterns by Platform

IMDb (International Users, Diverse Backgrounds)

  • “Good pacing, balanced black humor and suspense.” Positive comments include: “Scary and shocking, yet somehow satisfying.”
  • On the other hand, there are also sobering voices: “AI thrillers feel very familiar,” “The story lacks depth; expecting more than entertainment leaves you disappointed,” “Might not rewatch it.”

Rotten Tomatoes

  • “A stimulating entertainment that balances social metaphor and humor” – Highly praised for its purity and completeness as a genre blend (SF/Horror/Dark Comedy).
  • Acting, especially Sophie Thatcher’s lead performance, received high praise for conveying “the uncanny intersection of emotion and machine.”Criticism exists, however. Key points raised include: “Themes and social questions are intriguing, but the script is shallow, with weak payoff of plot threads and a flimsy suspense structure,” “Momentum slows heading into the finale,” and “The ending leaves a sour taste.”

SNS/Fan Reactions (reddit, etc.)

Some embraced the dark humor and positively interpreted the “uncanny relationship between AI and humans,” “modern tech dependency,” and “sexual commodification.” One wrote:
  • “Companion feels more like a darkly comedic Black Mirror ep than a horror film.”
  • “I loved this film. It absolutely had things to like about it.”
Conversely, others noted it was “half-baked as a thriller,” “lacking originality,” and “had plot inconsistencies,” and “not worth rewatching.”

Impact from Genre, Release Timing, and Buzz

Genre: Sci-Fi × Horror × Dark Comedy × Social Satire. A genre-blending work tackling multiple themes simultaneously: AI, gender, power structures, and consumer culture. Such genres resonate well with critics who favor socially conscious elements and align with current anxieties around AI/technology.
Director: Drew Hancock’s feature debut. Despite its low budget (reported at around $10 million), it earned praise for “cost-effectively crafting visuals and structure” through direction, pacing, and casting.
Release Timing: Early 2025. Its timely themes of AI and the commodification of gender/sexuality may have coincided with heightened social interest, potentially boosting its reception.
Buzz: High attention stemmed from reports linking it to a production team with a hit previous work. Topics like “robot lovers,” “sexual consumption,” and “AI runaway” easily trended on social media, fueling word-of-mouth.

Overall Assessment: Audience Appeal/Limitations

This film powerfully presents the precariousness of “modern society’s tech dependency,” “sexuality and consumption,” and “power dynamics” without sacrificing entertainment value. Stylish, accessible, and thematically rich—it’s a rare film with appeal to both critics and audiences.
That said, its script structure, lack of thematic depth, and weak resolution in the final act are evident. Audiences seeking lingering resonance after viewing, or critics expecting deep social analysis, will likely find it unsatisfying.
In conclusion,
  • This film strongly resonates with audiences who:
  • “Want to enjoy black humor and thrills as entertainment.”
  • “Want to casually appreciate metaphors about AI, sex, and consumer culture?” Conversely, for those seeking “deep social analysis,” “thorough philosophical inquiry,” or “logically consistent suspense,” satisfaction may be somewhat diminished—that’s where I see it standing.
This film is a “light problem-raising movie that combines entertainment value with social satire.” Among this year’s films, I feel it should be remembered as a unique entry that possesses both ‘lightness’ and “venom.”

Information on this page is current as of .
Please check each site for the latest scores.

This page is written from the "Companion" which is available on Amazon Prime Video Com.

This page introduces the synopsis, impressions, and ratings of "Companion" available on Amazon Prime Video Com. If you are interested in this movie, please check it out at Amazon Prime Video Com!

Amazon Prime Video Com Companion Amazon Prime Video Com Companion

The information on this page is current as of .
Please check the Amazon Prime Video en site for the latest distribution status.

Official SNS Post

Categories

VOD